Konstruksi Relasi Dialog Ilmu Sosial dan Agama melalui Pendekatan Epistemologi Titus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v5i2.397Keywords:
Social Sciences; Religious Studies; Epistemology; Islamic Studies, ReligionAbstract
The positivistic style in the development of science in the modern period resulted in the dichotomy of science and religion and the loss of moral values, giving rise to many wars. In this case, religion is considered a moral control that maintains social harmony. This research aims to discover the relationship between social science (as a form of scientific knowledge) and religious science, as well as efforts to shape the relationship between the two. This research is a library research study using the Titus epistemological approach. This research found that firstly, the objects of study in social science and religious science are compatible with humans and their environment, even though in religion the object of study is physical and metaphysical, while in social science the object is based on reason and empirical. Second, the research methodology of social science is different from religious science except in the case of hermeneutics. Third, the concept of validity between the two is different. From these three findings, it can be concluded that the ‘dialogue’ relations between social science and religious science in terms of epistemology is in humans and their environment, and the existence of hermeneutics in its methodology.
References
Bhattacherjee, Anol. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Second edition. Tampa, Florida? Anol Bhattacherjee, 2012.
Dora, Nuriza, Henni Endayani, dan Eka Susanti. Pengantar Ilmu Sosial. Medan: CV. Widya Puspita, 2018.
Hidayah, Husnul, Deni Iriyadi, dan Iffan Ahmad Gufron. “Relasi Sains dan Agama dalam Perpspektif Ian Graeme Barbour.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 13, no. 1 (2022).
Hidayatullah. “Realasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Agama.” In Proceeding of ICECRS. University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia, 2016: 901-907.
Hidayatullah, Syarif. “Agama dan Sains: Sebuah Kajian tentang Relasi dan Metodologi.” Jurnal Filsafat 29, no. 1 (2019): 102–33.
Kasno. Filsafat Agama. Cet. 1. Surabaya: Penerbit Alpha, 2018.
Khamim, Siti, Ridha Ahida, Muslimah, dan Iffah Khoiriyyatul Muyassaroh. “Sumber-sumber Pengetahuan dalam Filsafat Ilmu.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tembusai 8, no. 1 (2024): 440–447.
Kusuma, Wira Hadi. “Epistemologi Bayani, Irfani, dan Burhani Al Jabiri dan Relevansinya bagi Studi Agama untuk Resolusi Konflik dan Peacebuillding.” Syi’ar 18, no. 1 (2018): 1–19.
Nasrullah, Amin, and M Ag. “EPISTEMOLOGI ILMU:” Jurnal Azkiya 5, no. 2 (2022): 1–19.
Nasution, Henni Syafriana. “Epistemologi Question: Hubungan antara Akal, Penginderaan, Intuisi dan Wahyu dalam Bangunan Keilmuan Islam,” Almufida 1, no. 1 (2016): 70-84.
Nurroh, Syampadzi. FILSAFAT ILMU Studi Kasus: Telaah Buku Filasafat Ilmu (Sebuah Pengantar Populer) oleh Jujun S. Suriasumantri “Doctoral Program, Graduate School of Environment Science,” :Universitas Gadjah Mada: Yogyakarta, 2017.
Nursyaidah, dan Agung Kaisar Siregar. “Sumber Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Managemen Pendidikan.” Darul ’Ilmi 9, no. 1 (2021): 69–83.
Rahmadi. Metodologi Penelitian Agama Berbasis 4 Pilar Filosofi Keilmuan. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing, 2023.
Reese, William L. Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion: Eastern and Western Thought. Atlantic Highlands, N.J: Humanities Press, 1980.
Rijal, Muhammad, dan Idrus Sere. “SARANA BERFIKIR ILMIAH.” Biosel: Biology Science and Education 6, no. 2 (December 27, 2017): 176. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v6i2.170.
Sari, Diana, dan Kholilur Rohman. “KEDUDUKAN EPISTEMOLOGI DALAM FILSAFAT BARAT.” JAQFI: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam 5, no. 1 (2020): 35–52.
Semiawan, Conny R., I. Made Putrawan, dan Th I. Setiawan. Dimensi kreatif dalam Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung, Indonesia: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 1988.
Silva, Premakumar de. “The Dhicotomy of Social and Natural Science.” Blog Reaserch. CEPA (Center for Poverty Analysis), February 24, 2016. https://cepa.lk/blog/the-dichotomy-of social-and-natural-science/.
Subanda, I Nyoman, dan Kadek Wiwin Dwi Wismayanti. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Bali, Pustaka Ekspresi, 2020.
Sunardi, Didi. “Hermeneutika dalam Kajian Agama.” Jurnal Kemuhammadiyahan dan Integrasi Ilmu 1, no. 1 (2024): 100–109.
Sungkar, Syakieb Ahmad. “Heurmenetika dan Perannya dalam Ilmu Sosial-Budaya.” Jurnal Dekonstruksi 1, no. 1 (2021): 96-108.
Susanto, Happy. “Konsep Paradigma Ilmu Sosial.” Muaddib 4, no. 2 (2014): 93–114.
Syahputra, Riyan. “Integrasi Ilmu-ilmu Agama Islam dengan Ilmu-ilmu Umum.” Book Chapter of Procedings Journey-Liaison ACademia and Society 1, no. 1 (2022): 809–20.
Titus, Harold H., Marilyn S. Smith, and Richard T. Nolan. Living Issues in Philosophy. 7th ed. New York: Van Nostrand, 1979.
Wahid, Lalu Abdurrahman. “EKSISTENSI DAN METODOLOGI PENDEKATAN FILOSOFIS DALAM STUDI ISLAM” 3 (2021): 472-488.
Yulanda, Atika. “Epistemologi Keilmuan Integratif-Interkonektif M. Amin Abdullah dan Implementasinya dalam Keilmuan Islam.” Tajdid 18, no. 1 (2019): 79–104.
Zulkarnaen, Iskandar. “Studi Deskriptif: Filsafat Agama dan Ruang Lingkup Kajian Pembahasannya.” Dirosat : Journal of Islamic Studies 6, no. 2 (September 27, 2021): 25. https://doi.org/10.28944/dirosat.v6i2.386.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Susan Diqrul Illahiyah, Muhammad Muntahibun Nafis, Muhammad Fikri Ahsan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.