Hakikat Manusia dan Relevansinya terhadap Isu-isu Kemanusiaan: Analisis Komparatif Filsafat Politik Thomas Hobbes dan John Locke

Authors

  • Fajrul Ilmy Darussalam Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
  • Andi Batara Indra Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
  • Saifur Rahman Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v5i2.400

Keywords:

Human Nature, Locke and Hobbes, Sovereignity, Freedom; Authority.

Abstract

Humans with all their attachments seem to increasingly emphasize that humans are basically very complex creatures. This research aims to re-examine the points of contact and differences in the views of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes regarding human nature and explore the extent of their relevance to contemporary humanitarian issues. This research is library research using a comparative study model, with several methodical elements such as interpretation, internal coherence, holistic, comparison, and description. The results are 1) Locke and Hobbes' ideas have fundamental similarities in the state of nature and the social contract, namely natural rights that are inherent in every individual and require another authority for the common good; 2) Locke and Hobbes' ideas also have differences. Each other in natural conditions and the social contract, namely the source and form of authority or legitimacy that is formed, and 3) both become the main pattern in the development of the concept of government or state related to humanitarian issues such as human rights, freedom and authority.

Author Biographies

Fajrul Ilmy Darussalam, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Lahir di Makassar, 8 Mei 1992. Pada tahun 2018 menempuh pendidikan Magister Filsafat di Fakultas Filsafat Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Saat ini beliau bekerja sebagai dosen di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo.

Andi Batara Indra, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Lahir di Watampone, 27 November 1990. Pada tahun 2016 menyelesaikan Program Magister Pendidikan di Program Pascasarjana Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Saat ini beliau bekerja sebagai dosen di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo.

Saifur Rahman, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Lahir di Sumenep, 24 Juli 1989. Ia menyelesaikan Program Studi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta pada tahun 2016. Saat ini  beliau bekerja sebagai dosen di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo.

References

Apeldoorn, Laurens Van. “Hobbes on Property: Between Legal Certainty and Sovereign Discretion.” Hobbes Studies 34, no. 1 (2021): 58–79.

BAĞCI, İkram. “Understanding of Sovereignty in The Establishment of Social Order and Freedom of The Individual According to Thomas Hobbes.” International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences/Uluslararasi Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 9, no. 31 (2018): 440–63.

Bakker, Anton, dan Achmad Charris Zubair. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Filsafat, 2021.

Borinshtein, Yevgen, Oleksandr Stovpets, Olga Kukshinova, Anton Kisse, dan Natalia Kucherenko. “Phenomena of Freedom and Justice in the Interpretations of T. Hobbes and J. Locke.” Amazonia Investiga 10, no. 42 (2021): 255–63.

Bouncer, David, dan Paul Kelly. “The Social Contract and Its Critics: An Overview.” Dalam The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. London: Routledge, 1994.

Bourbouri, Khashayar, Hossein-Ali Nowzari, dan Reza Shirzadi. “A Comparative Glance at Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s Ideas on the Concept of Freedom.” International Journal of Political Science 11, no. 4 (2021): 71–92.

Bruner, Justin P. “Locke, Nozick and The State of Nature.” Philosophical Studies 177 (2020): 705–26.

Burnyeat, Gwen, dan Miranda Sheild Johansson. “An Anthropology of The Social Contract: The Political Power of An Idea.” Critique of Anthropology 42, no. 3 (2022): 221–37.

Crisp, Roger. Sacrifice Regained: Morality and Self-Interest in British Moral Philosophy from Hobbes to Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Economides, Neophitos. “The Theory of Social Contract and Legitimacy Today.” Social Sciences 9, no. 5 (2018): 19–28.

Eng, David Tneh Cheng. “Hobbes and Locke Revisited: On Understanding, Nature and The Sovereign in The 21st Century.” Agathos 6, no. 1 (2015): 98–107.

Grigore, Nora. “Hobbes and Locke in The State of Nature and What Threatens Peace in Society.” Studies in Epistemology & Theory of Values/Studii de Epistemologie şi Teorie a Valorilor 9 (2023): 163–77.

Jama, Andreas, dan Robertus Wijanarko. “Membaca Sikap Antisosial dalam Praktik Korupsi di Indonesia (Tinjauan Atas Konsep Manusia Menurut Thomas Hobbes).” Souvereignty 3, no. 2 (2024): 59–68.

Junaedi, Junaedi, dan Agus Dimiyati. “Hakikat Dan Fungsi Negara: Telaah Atas Persoalan Kebangsaan Di Indonesia.” Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan 11, no. 01 (2020): 1–9.

Lantigua, David M. “Liberal Domination, Individual Rights, and the Theological Option for the Poor in History.” Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, (2018): 169–86.

Latt, Chaw Kay Khaing. “The Impact of John Locke’s Political Thought on The Revolutions in The West.” Myanmar Acad. Arts Sci. XIX (2021): 207–18.

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Philadelphia: Kay & Troutman, 1847.

———. Two Treatises of Government. Disunting oleh P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Malcolm, Noel. “Thomas Hobbes: Liberal Illiberal.” Journal of the British Academy 4 (Agustus 2016): 113–35.

Martinich, A P. “Natural Sovereignty and Omnipotence in Hobbes’s.” Hobbes on Politics and Religion, (2018): 29.

Muni, Abd. “Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia.” Al’Adalah 23, no. 1 (2020): 65–78.

Neacșu, Adriana. “John Locke—Theorist of Limiting and Supervising Political Power by Citizens.” Dialogue and Universalism, no. 2 (2021): 49–65.

Nursanik, Nursanik, dan Ida Mursidah. “Kritik Nalar Pemikiran Politik Thomas Hobbes.” Al Qisthas Jurnal Hukum dan Politik 11, no. 2 (2020): 18–45.

Olsthoorn, Johan. “Leviathan Inc.: Hobbes on The Nature and Person of The State.” History of European Ideas 47, no. 1 (2021): 17–32.

Sasan, John Michael V. “The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis.” Shanlax International Journal of Arts Science and Humanities 9, no. 1 (Juli 2021): 34–45.

Schmandt, Henry J. Filsafat Politik; Kajian Historis dari Zaman Yunani Kuno Sampai Zaman Modern. Disunting oleh Ahmad Baidlowi dan Imam Baehaqi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.

Schönegger, Philipp. “The Lockean Prerogative, Natural Law, and Political Power.” Locke Studies 20 (2020): 1–22.

Schouls, Peter A. Reasoned Freedom: John Locke and Enlightenment. London: Cornell University Press, 2018.

Setyawan, Vincentius Patria. “Asas Legalitas Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum.” Justitia et Pax 37, no. 1 (2021): 134.

Siswadi, Gede Agus. “Studi Komparasi Konsep Tuhan Menurut Baruch de Spinoza dan Karl Theodor Jaspers.” Widya Katambung 14, no. 2 (2023): 84–94.

Siswanto, Dwi. Orientasi Pemikiran Filsafat Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Lima, 2008.

Umeh, George-Franklin. “The Social Contracts of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: A Comparative Analysis.” AMAMIHE Journal of Applied Philosophy 19, no. 2 (2021): 19–35.

Ward, Ian, Narulita Yusron, M Khozim, dan Nur Ainun Mangunsong. Politika, Kekuasaan dan Pragmatisme: Seri Pengantar Teori Hukum Kritis. Yogyakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.

Wijaya, Daya Negri. “Kontrak Sosial Menurut Thomas Hobbes dan John Locke.” JSPH 1, no. 2 (Desember 2016). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287321846.pdf.

Ying, Zirui. “From Plato to Locke: The Development of Western Political Philosophy.” Dalam 2nd International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2020), 56–59. Atlantis Press, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-29

How to Cite

Darussalam, F. I., Indra, A. B. ., & Rahman, S. . (2024). Hakikat Manusia dan Relevansinya terhadap Isu-isu Kemanusiaan: Analisis Komparatif Filsafat Politik Thomas Hobbes dan John Locke. Media: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi, 5(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v5i2.400