Max Scheler’s Sympathy (Pannakipagrikna) in the Context of Online Education

Authors

  • Joeffrey Almazan Saint Louis University Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v6i2.649

Keywords:

pannakipagrikna, online learning, phenomenology, value-centered, sympathy

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of Max Scheler’s concept of sympathy in the context of online education by situating it within the Ilocano cultural value of pannakipagrikna, which embodies empathy and emotional sensitivity. Employing a transcendental-phenomenological approach, the research integrates textual analysis of Scheler’s works with semi-structured interviews among Ilocano learners. The findings reveal that pannakipagrikna is expressed through four key themes: pannakaawat (understanding), naimpasnekan a panagdengngeg (active listening), panangtarabay (guidance), and pannakimaysa (emotional unity). These insights highlight the importance of affective and value-based engagement in addressing emotional detachment in online learning. The teacher emerges not merely as a transmitter of knowledge but as a moral and empathetic guide fostering students’ holistic development. The study concludes that contextualizing Scheler’s philosophical anthropology through Ilocano values enriches value-centered pedagogy and broadens the scope of phenomenology beyond Western frameworks.

Author Biography

Joeffrey Almazan, Saint Louis University Philippines

Born in Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya on September 25, 1972.    He finished his Bachelor of Arts  in Philosophy at San Pablo Major Seminary, Baguio  City.  He completed his Master of Arts in Religious  Studies at the CICM (Congregatio Immaculati Cordis Mariae) Maryhill School of Theology (MST),  Quezon City.  He finished his Doctor of Philosophy in Theology at the Ecclesiastical Faculty, University of Santo Tomas, Manila with specializations on Systematic Theology and Missiology.  He is full-time Professor and served as Department Head of the Department of Religion, SLU, Baguio City (August 2015-July 2017).  He is the past Graduate Program Coordinator for Liberal Arts, School of Advanced Studies, SLU, Baguio City from 2017-2021.  He is a visiting Lecturer at CICM-Maryhill School of Theology (MST).

References

Arya, Aneri. “An Overview of Textual Analysis as a Research Method for Cultural Studies.” International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field 6, no. 3 (March 2020).

Baticulon, Ronnie E., et al. “Barriers to Online Learning in the Time of COVID-19: A National Survey of Medical Students in the Philippines.” medRxiv, July 18, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.16.20155747.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms III. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.

Cheung, Ching-yuen. Person and Man in the Philosophical Anthropology of Max Scheler. Master's Thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2000.

Creswell, John. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. California: Sage Publications, 1999.

Fu-Lin, Chien. Love in Education: A Philosophical Examination with Special Reference to the Phenomenology of Max Scheler. London: University of London, 1997.

Husserl, Edmund. “Erste Philosophie. Erste Teil: Kritishe Ideengeschichte.” Edited by R. Boehm. Husserliana, vol. 2. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1956.

Mercado, Leonardo N. Elements of Filipino Philosophy. Tacloban City: Divine Word University Publications, 1993.

Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Scheler, Max. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Translated by Manfred S. Frings and Roger L. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Scheler, Max. The Nature of Sympathy. London: Routledge, 1979.

Zahavi, Dan. “Empathy and the Other-Directed Intentionality.” Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy

Downloads

Published

2025-10-09

How to Cite

Almazan, J. (2025). Max Scheler’s Sympathy (Pannakipagrikna) in the Context of Online Education. Media: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi, 6(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v6i2.649