Kritik Epistemologis Jacques Rancière atas Marxisme Struktural Louis Althusser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v7i1.762Keywords:
Jacques Ranciere; Louis Althusser; Interpretation of Marxism; Epistemologi BreakAbstract
This paper critically examines Jacques Rancière rejection of Althusser’s concept of interpretation in epistemological rupture. Rancière critique stems from his rejection of hierarchical epistemological structures in the dichotomy between science and ideology. For Rancière, this approach actually constrains the division of social aesthetics of class outside of power as an ideological object, rather than as an autonomous political subject. By examining the original works of Rancière and Althusser, the author uses a qualitative research model. Through this research model, the author analyzes Rancière's critique of Althusser in terms of elitism, epistemological break, and the separation of science and politics using hermeneutics. The results of this research contain hermeneutic arguments that emphasize that the interpretation of Marxismmust be grounded withinsocial aesthetics. This can happen because Ranciere attempts to present the progressive side of the Marxist tradition that has collapsed due to Althusser's concept of epistemological break.
References
Althusser, Louis. Reading Capital. London: Verso, 1970
--------------------- For Marx. Paris: The Penguin Press, 1969
--------------------- Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essay Translated From The French by Ben Brewster. New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1971
---------------------- Esai Self-Critisim Translated by Grahame Lock. NLB, 1976
Aprilianto, Tedy. Geneaologi Pemikiran Louis Althusser: Diskursus Marxisme-Strukturalis, Negara, dan Kritik Kekuasaan. Solok: PT Mafy Media Lestari, 2025.
Araujo, Tais. “May 68’s Effects in Jacques Rancière’s Path: The Althusserian Dichotomy between Science and Ideology Questioned.” Pro-Posições Campinas,SP V.35 (2024): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2023-0044EN.
Baker, Anton, dan Achmad Charris Zubair. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 1998.
Balibar, Etienne. “Althusser’s Object.” Social Text No.28 (Summer,1994) (1994): 157–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/466368.
Bourg, Julian. From Revolution to Ethic: May 1968 and Contemporary French Thought. London: Mc-Gill Queen’s University Press, 2007. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zx04
Brown, Nathan. “Red Years: Althusser’s Lesson, Rancière’s Error and the Real Movement of History Dossier: The Althusser–Rancière Controversy.” Radical Philosophy 170 (2011): 16–24.
Chambers, Samuel A. “Jacques Rancière’s Lesson on the Lesson.” Educational Philosophy and Theory Vol. 45 No. 6 (2013): 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.723887.
Eagleton, Terry. Ideology an Introduction. London and New York: Longman, 1994.
Erdem, Erdinc. “Althusser’s Relation to Hegel: French Hegelianism, Marxism, and Aleatory Materialism.” A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society 31 (2019): 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2019.1629198
Fajardo, Christian. “Jacques Rancière: Aesthetics, Time, Politics.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 14 (2022.): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2022.2049497
Frank, Jason. “Logical Revolts: Jacques Rancière and Political Subjectivization.” Political Theory 43 (2015): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715573417
Fraser, John. “Louis Althusser on Science, Marxism and Politics.” Science & Society 40 No.4 (1976): 438–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/003682377604000403
Guerro, Daniel. “Reconciling Theory and Praxis: Defending Subjective Agency Against Althusser’s Structuralism.” Honors Undergraduate Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2025.
Horowitz, Morgan. “On the Supposed Break in Marx.” Journal Sciene & Society 78, No. 4 (2014): 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2014.78.4.454
Kosat, Oktovianus. “Louis Althusser: Marxis Struktural.” Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi 11, No. 2 (2021): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v11i2.1113
Lampert, Matthew. “Jacques Ranciere and The Politics of Theory.” Journal Cultural Critique 106 (2020): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5749/culturalcritique.106.2020.0001
Lewis, William. “Louis Althusser.” Stanfor Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/althusser/.
Montag, Warren. Althusser and His Contemporaries Philosophy’s Perpetual War. London: Duke University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822399049
Musto, Marcello. “The ‘Young Marx’ Myth in Interpretations of the Economic–Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” Critique Journal Od Socialist Theory 43, no. 2 (2015): 233–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2015.1051759.
Perica, Ivana. “The Archipolitics of Jacques Rancière.” Krisis: Journal for Contemporarry Philospohy 39, No. 1 (2019): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.39.1.36257.
Ranciere, Jacques. Althusser’s Lesson Translated by Emiliano Battista. London: He Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
———. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press,
——— Mallar Me The Politics of the Siren. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
———. On The Shores of Politics Translated Liz Heron. London: Verso, 2007.
———. “The Aesthetic Dimension: Aesthetics, Politics, Knowledge.” Journal Critical Inquiry 36, No. 1 (2009): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1086/606120
———. The Philosopher and His Poor Translated by John Drurry, Corine Oster and Andrew Parker. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385707
———. The Politics of Aesthetics The Distribution of the Sensible Translated with an Introduction by Gabriel Rockchill. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004.
Retnick, Stephen, Richar Wolff. “Althusser Liberitarian of Marxian Theory” in The Althusserian Legacy. London: Verso, 1993
Ross, Alison. “The Aesthetic Fable: Cinema in Jacques Ranciere’s ‘Aesthetic Politics.’” Journal Sub Stance 28, No. 1 (2009): 128–150. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40492986
Smith, Neil. “Symptomatic Silence in Althusser: The Concept of Nature and the Unity of Science.” Science & Society 44, No. 1 (1980): 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003682378004400103
Suryajaya, Martin. Sejarah Estetika: Era Klasik sampai Kontemporer. Jakarta: Gang Kabel, 2016. http://repo.driyarkara.ac.id/id/eprint/366.
Suter, Mischa. “A Thorn in the Side of Social History: Jacques Rancière and Les Révoltes Logiques.” International Review of Social History 57 (2012): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859011000769.
Thomas, Paul. Marxism and Scientific Socialism: From Engels to Althusser. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2008.
Valentine, Jeremy. “Ranciere and Contemporary Political Problems.” Journal Paragraph 28, No. 1 (2005): 46–60. https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2005.28.1.46.
Yunus, Firdaus M. Materialisme. Banda Aceh: Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN AR-RANIRY dan PT. Bambu Kuning Utama, 2019.
Zwabrt, Hub. Continental Philosophy of Technoscience. Swiss: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84570-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tedy Aprilianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
